This Court rejected the application for condonation of delay in filing a review petition. It dismissed the review petition as the delay grounds were not convincing or explained satisfactorily.
Application for condonation of delay rejected; Review petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 46
Case :- CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 319 of 2021
Applicant :- M/S Bright Infracon Pvt. Ltd. And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Shivam Yadav
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Order on Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application
Sri Aditya Yadav holding brief of Sri Shivam Yadav learned Advocate has appeared in the review matter.
The delay in filing the review petition has not been explained to the satisfaction of the Court. The ground taken in the affidavit accompanying delay condonation application is not convincing.
The delay condonation application is, accordingly, rejected.
Order Sheet
The review petition is, thus, dismissed.
Order Date :- 21.3.2022 Brijesh
Digitally signed by BRIJESH KUMAR Date: 2022.03.21 16:31:43 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the review petition should be condoned.
Whether the grounds for delay explanation are acceptable to the Court.
M/S Bright Infracon Pvt. Ltd. And Another
Sunita Agarwal
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
