In a revision petition pending for 25 years, the Court refused an adjournment due to unavailability of records and dismissed the matter for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- CIVIL REVISION No. - 133 of 1997
Revisionist :- The Board Of Revenue Opposite Party :- Sri Saifuddin And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- H.P. Tripathi,S.C.
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
The present revision is of the year 1997. Learned Standing Counsel sought adjournment on the ground that the record is not available.
The matter is pending for the last 25 years.Therefore, this Court is not inclined to adjourn the case on the ground of nonavailability of records. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Order Date :- 23.9.2022 NS
Digitally signed by NITIN KUMAR Date: 2022.09.24 16:17:09 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition can be attended to when the record is not available after a delay of 25 years.
The Board Of Revenue
Saral Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
