In a contempt application regarding a writ order, the Court found the matter rendered infructuous as the opposite party had already complied with the writ order prior to the filing of this application. The application was dismissed accordingly.
Contempt notice discharged; application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 10
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 931 of 2020
Applicant :- Uma Shankar Saroj And 4 Others Opposite Party :- Ruby Singh, Secretary , Board Of Basic Education
Counsel for Applicant :- Shailesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- Yatindra
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Sri Yatindra, learned counsel for the opposite party, has placed before the Court the decision taken by the opposite party, pursuant to the order of writ Court dated 08.02.2019, on 28.02.2020.
In view of the said fact as the order of writ Court was to the extent to decide the representation which the authority had already done on 28.02.2020, present contempt application is rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
Contempt notice stands discharged.
File consign to record.
Order Date :- 20.10.2022 Shekhar
Digitally signed by SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY Date: 2022.10.20 17:22:39 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Uma Shankar Saroj And 4 Others
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
