Application filed for contempt against the respondent for alleged non-compliance of a writ court order dated 05.10.2021. The applicant's counsel informed the court that compliance had already been effected, extinguishing the cause of action.
Contempt application dismissed as the order under challenge was already complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 775 of 2022
Applicant :- Krishna Kumar Opposite Party :- Pratap Singh Baghel, Secretary Counsel for Applicant :- Navin Kumar Sharma
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
The applicant is before this Court for a direction to initiate contempt proceeding against the opposite party for wilful disobedience of the judgement and order dated 05.10.2021 passed in Writ Petition No. 447 of 2021.
Today when the matter was taken up, it was informed by Shri Navin Kumar Sharma learned counsel for the applicant that the order passed by the writ Court has already been complied with, therefore, no cause of action remained survive.
In this view of the matter, Court is of the opinion that the order passed by the writ court has been complied with, therefore, no cause of action remained survive.
In view of the same, the present contempt application is dismissed.
This order is passed in the presence of Shri Yatindra, learned counsel for the opposite party.
Order Date :- 19.9.2022 Swati
Digitally signed by SWATI PATHAK Date: 2022.09.22 16:20:17 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondent for alleged wilful disobedience of the writ court order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Krishna Kumar
Pratap Singh Baghel
Prakash Padia
Swati Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
