This is a thin order dismissing a contempt application because the applicant was absent and the court found compliance or loss of interest.
Contempt application dismissed; liberty to file for revival granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6592 of 2014
Applicant :- Haneef Opposite Party :- Pawan Kumar S.P. Shamli And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Avinahs Pandey
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
List has been revised but nobody is present on behalf of the applicant whereas learned Standing Counsel is present on behalf of State.
From perusal of the record, it appears that either the order of the this Court has been complied with or the parties have lost their interest.
In the circumstances, it is needless to keep pending this contempt application.
In view of the same, the present contempt application is dismissed.
However, in case, any cause of action still survives in the present application, the applicant shall be at liberty to file application for revival of the present application.
Order Date :- 8.8.2022 Pramod Tripathi
Digitally signed by PRAMOD TRIPATHI Date: 2022.08.11 14:43:48 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Haneef
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Pramod Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
