The single judge dismissed the contempt application due to the absence of the applicant and non-prosecution, deeming it needless to keep the matter pending.
Dismissed the contempt application with liberty to file for recall within two months without affidavit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6355 of 2014
Applicant :- Hanees Opposite Party :- Vinay Kumar Sharma Exe. Engineer Ele. Dist. Division Counsel for Applicant :- O.P. Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- S.C.
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
List has been revised but nobody is present on behalf of the applicant though learned Standing Counsel is present.
From perusal of the record, it is clear that either the order of this court has been complied with or the parties have lost their interest to proceed with the matter.
In the circumstances, it is needless to keep pending this contempt application.
Accordingly, the present contempt is dismissed with liberty to file application for recall of this order within two months in case matter still survives if such an application is filed it need not be accompanied by any affidavit.
Order Date :- 6.8.2022 saqlain
Digitally signed by SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER Date: 2022.08.10 09:37:59 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Hanees
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
