In this contempt application, the court observed that the applicant had already complied with the writ court order. Consequently, it held the application to be infructuous and dismissed it without detailed reasoning.
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 656 of 2020
Applicant :- Pateshwari Shukla Opposite Party :- Indukant Srivastava Chief Engineer U.P. Jal Nigam And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Savita Jain
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Heard Ms. Neha, Advocate, holding brief of Ms. Savita Jain, learned counsel for the applicant.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that order of the writ court has already complied with, therefore, the present contempt application lost its efficacy.
Accordingly, in terms of submissions of learned counsel for the applicant, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 19.11.2022 Gaurav/-
Digitally signed by GAURAV PAL Date: 2022.11.21 10:00:46 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Pateshwari Shukla
Indukant Srivastava
Chief Engineer U.P. Jal Nigam
Gaurav Pal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
