The applicant was not present. The court found no need to keep the contempt application pending as the impugned order likely complied with or parties lost interest. The application was dismissed with a liberty to recall.
Liberty to file application for recall of order within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1089 of 2015
Applicant :- Amrit Lal Bhartiya Opposite Party :- Arun Kumar Singh S.D.M. Allahabad And Anr
Counsel for Applicant :- R.N. Yadav
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
List has been revised but nobody is present on behalf of the applicant.
The applicant is before this Court for a direction to initiate contempt proceeding against the opposite party for wilful disobedience of the judgement and order dated 27.1.2015 passed in Writ Petition No.43282 of 2014.
From perusal of the record, it is clear that either the order of this court has been complied with or the parties have lost their interest to proceed with the matter.
In the circumstances, it is needless to keep pending this contempt application.
Accordingly, the present contempt is dismissed with liberty to file application for recall of this order within two months in case matter still survives if such an application is filed it need not be accompanied by any affidavit.
Order Date :- 4.8.2022 S.K.
Digitally signed by SWEETY KANOJIA Date: 2022.08.08 10:36:21 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Amrit Lal Bhartiya
Arun Kumar Singh
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
