Contempt application dismissed after finding the impugned Writ Court order was complied with. Applicant retained liberty to file a recall application if non-compliance is established.
Liberty to file recall application against the order granted; otherwise the application is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 502 of 2020
Applicant :- Smt. Murati Devi Opposite Party :- Sri Gyan Prakash Tripathi, D.M. Mau And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Gyanendra Prakash Srivastava
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
List has been revised.
Counsel for the applicant is not present.
It appears that order of Writ Court has been complied with, therefore, counsel for the applicant is not present.
In such view of the fact, contempt application is dismissed and is consigned to record.
However, applicant is at liberty to file a recall application against the order of this Court, if she finds that the order of Writ Court has not been complied with.
Order Date :- 11.5.2022 Sattyarth
Digitally signed by SATTYARTH ANAND Date: 2022.05.13 18:07:57 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Murati Devi
Sri Gyan Prakash Tripathi
Saral Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
