In the absence of the applicant, the court dismissed the pending contempt application, assuming compliance or loss of interest, granting liberty to recall.
Liberty to file an application for recall of this order within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4292 of 2014
Applicant :- P.L. Baranwal Opposite Party :- Shri Manoj Singh Asstt. Registrar And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Jitendra Kumar Srivastava,Anoop Baranwal,Jitendra Kumar Sharma
Counsel for Opposite Party :- S.C.,Ajay Kumar Baranwal
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
List has been revised but nobody is present on behalf of the applicant though learned Standing Counsel is present.
From perusal of the record, it is clear that either the order of this court has been complied with or the parties have lost their interest to proceed with the matter.
In the circumstances, it is needless to keep pending this contempt application.
Accordingly, the present contempt is dismissed with liberty to file application for recall of this order within two months in case matter still survives if such an application is filed it need not be accompanied by any affidavit.
Order Date :- 12.9.2022 saqlain
Digitally signed by SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER Date: 2022.09.14 16:41:44 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
P.L. Baranwal
Shri Manoj Singh
Prakash Padia
SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
