The applicant failed to appear to press the contempt application pending since 2018. The court noted the applicant's reluctance and dismissed the application for want of prosecution.
The contempt application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3334 of 2018
Applicant :- Parmesh Kumar Pandey Opposite Party :- Shyam Prasad Yadav Distt.Inspector Of Schools Pratapgarh.
Counsel for Applicant :- Vikas Singh
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Case called out. None appears on behalf of the applicant to press the application.
On 14.12.2018, following order was passed.
"Case called in revised list. None appears on behalf of the petitioner.
In the interest of justice, list in the next cause list."
It is evident from the order sheet that the applicant is reluctant to pursue the case, which is pending since 2018.
The application stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 4.11.2022 VKS
Digitally signed by VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.11.14 11:09:57 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a contempt application stands dismissed when the applicant fails to appear to press the application.
Parmesh Kumar Pandey
Shyam Prasad Yadav
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
