A contempt application was dismissed as infructuous since the opposing party's representation had already been decided by a compliant writ court order dated 05.03.2019, rendering the current application ineffective.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 147 of 2019
Applicant :- Ram Chandra Opposite Party :- Dr.Anil Kumar District Magistrate Ayodhya And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Case called out. None appears on behalf of the applicant to press the application.
Shri Mohit Jauhari, learned Standing Counsel submits that in compliance of the order of the writ Court, the representation of the applicant has already been decided by Mr. Anuj Kumar Jha, then District Magistrate, Ayodhya dated 05.03.2019. Copy of the order dated 05.03.2019 provided by the learned Standing Counsel is taken on record. It is, thus, submitted that the application has lost its efÏcacy and may be dismissed.
Considering the submissions of the learned Standing Counsel and going through the order dated 05.03.2019, the application stands dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 4.11.2022 VKS
Digitally signed by VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.11.14 11:03:50 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt application stands dismissed as infructuous in light of compliance with the writ court order.
Ram Chandra
Dr. Anil Kumar District Magistrate Ayodhya And Anr.
Rajeev Singh
Vivek Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
