The applicant failed to appear in person or through counsel to press the pending contempt application. The court dismissed the matter for want of prosecution due to the applicant's reluctance to pursue the case.
The application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2115 of 2018
Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Singh Opposite Party :- Sahab Singh Niranjan Dir. Of Educationsecondary Lko.Andanr. Counsel for Applicant :- Ankit Pande
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Case called out. None appears on behalf of the applicant to press the application.
It is evident from the order sheet that the applicant is reluctant to pursue the case, which is pending since 2018.
The application stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 22.11.2022 VKS
Digitally signed by VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.11.26 14:53:06 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Sunil Kumar Singh
Sahab Singh Niranjan Dir. Of Educationsecondary Lko.Andanr.
Rajeev Singh
Vivek Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
