Single bench dismissed a contempt petition as infructuous after learned counsel for the opposite party submitted that the impugned writ court order had been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1733 of 2018
Applicant :- Diwakar Pandey Opposite Party :- Nivedita Shukla Chief Secy. Food And Civil Supply And Anr.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Ji Trivedi
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Case called out.
No one is present on behalf of applicant to press the application. Heard Shri Vinayak Saxena, learned counsel for the opposite party.
Shri Vinayak Saxena, learned counsel for the opposite party submits that the order passed by Writ Court has been complied with.
The contempt petition has thus lost its efficacy.
Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 22.11.2022
Amit/-
Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR Date: 2022.11.24 10:10:08 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Diwakar Pandey
Rajeev Singh
Amit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
