Rajesh Prasad v. Shri Vinay Kumar Pandey,Director
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt application, the court held that the applicant's lawyer stated the matter had become infructuous, leading to dismissal.
In a contempt application, the court held that the applicant's lawyer stated the matter had become infructuous, leading to dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1660 of 2022
Applicant :- Rajesh Prasad Opposite Party :- Shri Vinay Kumar Pandey,Director Counsel for Applicant :- Bhawesh Pratap Singh,Aman Arya
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant states that the present application has become infructuous.
On the statement of the counsel for the applicant, the application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 29.3.2022 Ashutosh
Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH SINGH Date: 2022.03.29 15:03:58 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajesh Prasad
Salil Kumar Rai
Ashutosh Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court