Mahesh Chand v. Raghunath and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition under Article 227 dismissed as infructuous due to lapse of time. No substantive legal principles were elucidated.
Petition under Article 227 dismissed as infructuous due to lapse of time. No substantive legal principles were elucidated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 86 of 2008
Petitioner :- Mahesh Chand Respondent :- Raghunath And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shyam Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Sunil Kumar Misra
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
List revised.
None appears on behalf of the counsel for the petitioner.
The writ petition has become infructous by efflux of time and is dismissed as such.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 25.3.2022 Ashutosh
Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH SINGH Date: 2022.03.25 14:17:42 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahesh Chand
Raghunath
Ashutosh Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court