In a contempt application, the respondent submitted that the writ court order had been complied with. Consequently, the court dismissed the application as infructuous.
The contempt application was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1307 of 2021
Applicant :- Rajiv Mishra Opposite Party :- Virendra Pratap Singh District Basic Shiksha Adhikari Hardoi Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Kumar Srivastava,Gyanendra Nath
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Case is called out.
No one has put in appearance on behalf of the applicant.
Sri Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent submits that order of the writ court has already complied with, therefore, the present contempt application lost its efficacy.
Accordingly, in terms of submissions of learned counsel for the respondent, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 2.12.2022 Gaurav/-
Digitally signed by GAURAV PAL Date: 2022.12.02 17:18:40 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Rajiv Mishra
Rajeev Singh
Gaurav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
