In this contempt application, the applicant did not appear to press the matter. The court dismissed the application for want of prosecution.
The contempt application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1822 of 2018
Applicant :- Sunita Devi Opposite Party :- Uday Bhan Tripathi District Magistrate Barabanki. Counsel for Applicant :- Vimal Kishor Singh
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
None appears on behalf of the applicant to press the application.
Matter relates to the year 2018 and order-sheet reveals that the case is not being pursued by the applicant.
Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 1.12.2022 Amit/-
Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR Date: 2022.12.02 17:12:34 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Sunita Devi
Uday Bhan Tripathi
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
