Application against Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner dismissed for non-service upon compliance of Writ Court order. Applicants allowed liberty to seek recall if compliance failed.
Applicant at liberty to file recall application finding Writ Court order not complied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1254 of 2020
Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Maurya And 6 Others Opposite Party :- Tej Pratap Singh Yadav, Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Counsel for Applicant :- Ramesh Chandra Shukla,Rashmi Shukla
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Sunil Kumar Gupta
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
List has been revised.
Counsel for the applicants is not present.
Counsel for the opposite party is present.
It appears that order of Writ Court has been complied with, therefore, counsel for the applicants is not present.
In such view of the fact, contempt application is dismissed and is consigned to record.
However, applicants are at liberty to file a recall application against the order of this Court, if they find that the order of Writ Court has not been complied with.
Order Date :- 11.5.2022 Sattyarth
Digitally signed by SATTYARTH ANAND Date: 2022.05.13 18:06:01 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashok Kumar Maurya And 6 Others
Saral Srivastava
Sattyarth Anand
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
