Dismissed

Deepu Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC17 May 2022BAIL/5976/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot, J. dismissed the applicant's bail application noting his criminal history and risk of tampering with evidence. The court directed the trial court to conclude the trial within six months and enforced strict coercive measures to ensure witness attendance.

What did the court decide?

Bail application dismissed; trial to be concluded within six months; coercive measures for witnesses directed.

Deepu Singh Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 68

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5976 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Deepu Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Tarun Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Gaurang Dwivedi,Ruchita Jain,Ruksana,Vikas Tiwari

¶4

Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Tarun Kumar Triapthi, learned counsel for the applicant, Ms. Ruchita Jain, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A for the State.

¶6

The criminal history of the applicant discloses that he is a repeat offender. He has a long criminal history of many grave offences. There is likelihood of his influencing the witnesses and tampering with the evidence.

¶7

At this stage no case for bail is made out. However, interest of justice will be served by directing the learned trial court to expedite the trial instead of enlarging the applicant on bail at this stage.

¶8

The bail application is dismissed.

¶9

The trial court is directed to conclude the trial within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The learned trial court shall proceed with the hearing on a day to day basis to ensure that the above stipulated timeline of one year is strictly adhered to. All prosecution witnesses also are directed to cooperate with the trial proceedings.

¶10

The learned trial court shall promptly take out all strict

¶11

coercive measures against all the witnesses in accordance with law who fail to appear in the trial proceeding.

¶12

Police and administrative authorities of the State are also directed to ensure that the coercive measures adopted by the court are given effect to in a scrupulous manner to ensure the presence of the witnesses on the appointed date before the trial court.

¶13

Considering the long pendency of the criminal cases of the applicant the District Judge, Mahoba is directed to ensure that all criminal cases are concluded quickly.

¶14

Order Date :- 17.5.2022 Pravin

¶15

Digitally signed by PRAVIN VERMA Date: 2022.05.20 10:24:28 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Deepu Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepu Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vasharat Vs State of U.P.

Sudheer Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Malkeet Singh Vs State of U.P.

Sarvjeet Verma Vs State of U.P.

Akhilesh @ Akhalesh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Zilani Vs State of U.P.