Allowed

Zilani v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC17 May 2022BAIL/10276/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot, J. allowed the bail application of Zilani under the UP Gangsters Act. The court held there is merit in the submission that the applicant is falsely implicated and not a gang member, granting bail subject to conditions without commenting on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Applicant Zilani to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties, subject to conditions including appearance before the trial court and non-interference with witnesses.

Zilani Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 68

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10276 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Zilani Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.

¶5

By means of this bail application the applicant has prayed to be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No.33 of 2022 at Police Station-Kerakat, District-Jaunpur under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant is in jail since 02.02.2022.

¶6

The bail application of the applicant was rejected by learned Special Judge (Gangster Act), Jaunpur on 18.02.2022.

¶7

Shri Manoj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. The applicant has been enlarged on bail in the solitary criminal case depicted in the gang chart. He is not a member of any criminal gang. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant does not have any criminal history apart from the above said case

¶8

Shri Indra Prakash Srivastava, learned A.G.A. could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. He, however, does

¶9

not dispute the fact that the applicant does not have any criminal history apart from this case.

¶10

I see merit in the submissions of the learned counsel for the applicant and hold that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶11

In the light of the preceding discussion and without making any observations on the merits of the case, the bail application is allowed.

¶12

Let the applicant-Zilani be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions.

¶13

(i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶14

(ii) The applicant will not influence any witness. (iii) The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶15

(iv) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court. Order Date :- 17.5.2022 Ashish Tripathi

¶17

Digitally signed by ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI Date: 2022.05.18 10:32:45 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Zilani v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Zilani v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vasharat Vs State of U.P.

Sudheer Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Malkeet Singh Vs State of U.P.

Sarvjeet Verma Vs State of U.P.

Deepu Singh Vs State of U.P.

Akhilesh @ Akhalesh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others