Vikash @ Rahul v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court rejected the bail application, holding it infructuous due to the conclusion of the trial and the applicant's conviction by the trial court.
The court rejected the bail application, holding it infructuous due to the conclusion of the trial and the applicant's conviction by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5963 of 2019
Applicant :- Vikash @ Rahul Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Arun Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Shri Arun Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the trial has been concluded and the applicant has been convicted by the learned trial court. The instant bail application has become infructuous.
The bail application is, accordingly, rejected.
Order Date :- 22.7.2022 Nadeem
Digitally signed by NADEEM AHMAD Date: 2022.07.26 12:33:19 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vikash @ Rahul
Ajay Bhanot
Nadeem Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court