report. Firstly, the range of error in determining the age is about two years and the same should be read in favour of the applicant at this stage. Secondly, the medical report is flawed. The latest medical protocol and relevant scientific criteria were excluded from consideration in the medical report. Shri Jayendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant then makes further submissions on merits of the bail. The applicant and the victim got acquainted to each other on a social media. Thereafter, they became intimate. The victim in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has admitted to intimacy with the applicant. She has further asserted that she accompanied him to Agra of her own volition. She travelled to various places and also stayed at a hotel with the applicant. She did not resist the applicant nor did she raise any alarm. The victim was a consenting party. The statement of the victim insofar as it implicates the applicant has been given under duress to deflect attention of her own conduct. However, subsequently in her statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C., the victim did not make any allegation of rape against the applicant. Material contradictions in the F.I.R., statements of the victim under Sections 161 Cr.P.C. and Section 164 Cr.P.C. discredit the prosecution
