It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has falsely been implicated in the present case. The applicant is not a member of any gang. According to the gang chart, the applicant is said to have been involved in two criminal cases, namely (i) Case Crime No. 60 of 2020 u/s 392, 411, 120-B I.P.C., P.S.- Paniyara, District- Maharajganj and (ii) Case Crime No. 189 of 2018 u/s 302, 307, 34, 120-B I.P.C. and 3/25 of Arms Act, P.S.Paniyara, District- Maharajganj, in which he has already been enlarged on bail vide orders dated 07.01.2021 and 14.12.2018 passed by coordinate Benches of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 44254 of 2020 and 47658 of 2018 respectively. Copies of aforesaid bail orders have been brought on record as Annexure No.3 to the afÏdavit filed in support of the bail application. Apart from two cases shown in the gang chart, the applicant has criminal history of four cases explained in paragraph no. 8 to the afÏdavit filed in support of the bail application. It is further submitted that identically circumstanced coaccused, Purshottam, has been enlarged on bail by coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 21.10.2022 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 45259 of 2022 respectively. The case of the applicant stands on identical footing and the applicant is also entitled to bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is languishing in jail since 02.06.2022. In case he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.