Allowed

Shakeel v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC30 Nov 2022BAIL/54283/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application dismissing the application or allowing it. The court allowed bail to the accused-applicant Shakeel in a trial case under the UP Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities Act, 1986, subject to personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail with personal bond and two sureties subject to conditions against tampering with evidence, cooperating in trial, and refraining from criminal activity.

Shakeel Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 90

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 54283 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Shakeel Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajnish Kumar Pandey,Santosh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Shiv Shanker Prasad,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

This bail application has been moved by the accused-applicant- Shakeel for grant of bail, in Case Crime No. 364 of 2022, under Section 2/3 of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti- Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Khair, District Aligarh, during trial.

¶7

Learned counsel for the accused-applicant while pressing the bail application submits that the accused-applicant has falsely been implicated in the instant case as well as in four cases mentioned in the gang chart. However, in all the cases mentioned in the gang chart, the applicant has been enlarged on bail by competent Courts and copies of the bail orders are also placed on record as Annexure no.3, 4 and 5 to the affidavit in support of bail application.

¶8

It is further submitted that apart from the single case mentioned in the gang chart, the applicant has criminal history of one more and in that case he has been enlarged on bail by the competent Court and copy of the bail order is annexed as Annexure N.6 to the affidavit. It is next submitted that applicant is languishing in jail since 29.04.2022 and there is no apprehension that the accused-applicant after release on bail, may flee from the process of law or may otherwise misuse the liberty.

¶9

Learned A.G.A., however, opposes the prayer for bail of the applicant but could not confront the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶10

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I am of the considered view that applicant has made out a case for bail. The

¶11

bail application is allowed.

¶12

Let the applicant- Shakeel involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶13

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶14

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶15

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶16

In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶17

Order Date :- 30.11.2022 Abhishek Singh

¶18

Digitally signed by ABHISHEK SINGH Date: 2022.11.30 17:35:08 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shakeel v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shakeel v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yash Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Raj Kumar Gautam Vs State of U.P.

Mohd. Riyaz @ Jhinak Vs State of U.P.

Amitesh Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Rohit Alias Lalla Vs State of U.P.

Vifai Vs State of U.P.