Yash Yadav v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Allowed bail to the applicant charged with offences under IPC Sections 409, 420, 467, 120B and IT Act Section 66D, subject to furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties.
What did the court decide?
Release on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount.
What the court decided
Court No. - 90
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 52864 of 2022
Applicant :- Yash Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shiv Shanker Prasad,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant- Yash Yadav with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 139 of 2022, under Sections 409, 420, 467, 120B I.P.C. and Section 66D of Information and Technology (Amendment) Act, Police Station- Kotwali, District- Kanpur Nagar, during the pendency of the trial.
It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case for the purpose of harassment. It is further submitted that the applicant having no connection with transaction alleged to have been carried by the Vikram and Nitin Soni or their companion. The applicant is not a beneficiary of any single penny received by the companies. It is also submitted that the prosecution has failed to collect any evidence regarding involvement of the applicant in the present case. It is further submitted that coaccused Nitin Soni has already been enlarged on bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 17.11.2022 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 51496 of 2022 and the applicant is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. It is also submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. It is next contended that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail. The applicant is in jail since 09.09.2022.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant entitled to bail in an offence involving complaints of criminal conspiracy, cheating, forgery, and hacking.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Yash Yadav
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Shiv Shanker Prasad
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/52864/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court