It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case for the purpose of harassment. False and fabricated prosecution story has been made by the police. There is no reliable evidence against the applicant. It is next argued that in the gang chart three cases are shown against the accused-applicant. It has further been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that in all the cases shown in the gang-chart, the applicant has already been enlarged on bail, copies of which have been enclosed as Annexure No.-3 to the affidavit accompanying the bail application. Apart from the above, the applicant has eight criminal antecedents to his credit but in all the eight cases, the applicant has also been enlarged on bail, copies of which have been enclosed as Annexure No.-4 to the affidavit accompanying the bail application. It is next contended that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail. The applicant is in jail since 3rd September, 2022.