Naseem v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for bail in a criminal trial regarding assault and causing hurt. The High Court allowed bail, noting parity with co-accused already granted bail and finding the applicant entitled to liberty under Article 21.
What did the court decide?
Applicant released on bail furnishing a personal bond and two sureties of like amount, subject to conditions against tampering, absconding, and without court presence.
What the court decided
Court No. - 93
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 50437 of 2022
Applicant :- Naseem Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Naushad,Gayyoor Ali Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Surendra Singh-I,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of applicant, is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that due to typographical error the name of police station has been mentioned as Jhanjhana in place of Jhinjhana, he has made a statement at the Bar that he may be permitted to correct the same.
Learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to correct the name of Police Station in the memo of the bail application during the course of the day.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the material on record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Naseem, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 291 of 2022, registered under Sections 452, 323, 325, 308, 504, 326 IPC, Police Station- Jhinjhana, DistrictShamli, during pendency of trial.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant deserves bail considering co-accused have been enlarged on bail and no specific role was assigned to him.
Whether the principle of parity applies to grant bail in the present circumstances.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Naseem
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Surendra Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/50437/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court