Allowed

Lala Rajpoot@ Raghvendra v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC4 Nov 2022BAIL/41830/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court allowed the bail application for the accused involved in cheating and forgery related to a sale deed where no funds passed through his account, citing his lack of interest in the transaction as grounds for bail.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties, subject to strict conditions regarding evidence tampering and witness intimidation.

Lala Rajpoot@ Raghvendra Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 45

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41830 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Lala Rajpoot@ Raghvendra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Hare Krishna Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

¶6

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has not committed the present offence. He has no concern with the present matter. Alleged offences are not made out against the applicant. There is no evidence against him. He has been languishing in jail since 16.5.2022 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.

¶7

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

It appears from the perusal of record that the accused is neither the vendee nor the vendor in the alleged sale deed. No consideration has been obtained by the applicant and no money has been deposited in the Bank account of the applicant nor any benefit has been derived from the alleged transaction. Grounds taken in the bail application are sufficient. Hence, keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh vs. State of U.P. and another, (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶9

Let the applicant Lala Rajpoot @ Raghvendra involved in Case Crime No.164 of 2021 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC, Police Station Moth, District - Jhansi be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

¶10

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the

¶11

trial.

¶12

The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶13

The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶14

The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.

¶15

The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.

¶17

Submission and observation recorded in the matter are only for the purpose of deciding the bail application. Trial court shall not be influenced in any way with the said observation / submission while deciding the trial.

¶18

Order Date :- 4.11.2022 ss

¶19

Digitally signed by SANDEEP SHARMA Date: 2022.11.04 14:10:58 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Lala Rajpoot@ Raghvendra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lala Rajpoot@ Raghvendra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Kumar Paswan Vs State of U.P.

Heera Lal and Another Vs State of U.P.

Ranno @ Ranu Vs State of U.P.

Aarif Khan Vs State of U.P.

Ramveer Singh Parmar Vs State of U.P.

Santosh Kumar Shukla Vs State of U.P.