It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case for the purpose of harassment. False and fabricated prosecution story has been made by the police. There is no reliable evidence against the applicant. It is next argued that in the gang chart only one case is shown against the accused-applicant. It has further been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the said case, copy of the bail order has been enclosed as Annexure No.-2 to the affidavit accompanying the bail application. Apart from the above, the applicant has six criminal antecedents to his credit but the same have satisfactorily been explained in the supplementary affidavit. It also argued that the coaccused, namely, Irfan Rana, Sultan, Shahid have already been enlarged on bail by Coordinate Benches of this Court vide orders dated 18th August, 2022, 14th September, 2022 and 30th September, 2022 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 34668 of 2022, 39869 of 2022 and 39128 of 2022 respectively. The case of the applicant is similar and identical to that of the aforesaid co-accused. As the applicant is also liable to be enlarged on bail. It is next contended that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail. The applicant is in jail since 15th August, 2022.
