Allowed

Sushila Devi v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC13 Sept 2022BAIL/37930/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail to the applicant in a bribery case pending trial, imposing conditions precedent including appearance at trial, non-interference with evidence, and specific appearance requirements for opening, charge framing, and statement recording under Section 313 Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

The applicant is released on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties, subject to specific conditions regarding appearance and conduct during the trial.

Sushila Devi Vs State of U.P. — Cheque Dishonour | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 69

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 37930 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Sushila Devi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sandeep Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Supplementary affidavit filed today by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶7

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Sushila Devi , with a prayer to release her on bail in Case Crime No. 110 of 2022, under Sections 498A, 304B IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Gajraula, District J.P. Nagar (Amroha) during pendency of trial.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the coaccused,Nempal Singh , has been granted bail by this Court on 12.9.2022 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.37665 of 2022. The case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is languishing in jail since 4.3.2022.

¶9

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail, but does not dispute the claim of parity.

¶10

Let the applicant involved in aforesaid case be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶11

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.

¶12

(ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶13

(iii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or as directed by the Court. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

(iv) In case the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

(v) The applicant shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶16

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶17

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶18

Order Date :- 13.9.2022 Deepika

¶19

Digitally signed by DEEPIKA SINGH Date: 2022.09.13 17:18:48 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sushila Devi v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sushila Devi v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohit Kumar Pal Vs State of U.P.

Satish Kesarwani Vs State of U.P.

Gyanendra @ Sonu Vs State of Up

Rahul Pratap Singh Vs State of U.P.

Bhura @ Zainuddin @ Sahil Vs State of U.P.

Vindesh Yadav Vs State of U.P.