Allowed

Jayveer @ Jaichandra v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC29 Aug 2022BAIL/35913/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous bail application regarding an FIR under IPC Sections 147, 148, and 307, the High Court, disposing within jurisdictional limits of Crl. Misc. Bail Apln. No. 35913 of 2022, held that the applicants conditions for bail were fulfilled and granted release on personal bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

The applicant released on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in like amount.

Jayveer @ Jaichandra Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 75

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35913 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Jayveer @ Jaichandra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Dhirendra Kumar Verma

¶4

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶5

Vakalatnama filed by Sri S.K. Tripathi, learned counsel for the informant, is taken on record.

¶6

Heard Sri Anurag Dubey, learned counsel for the applicant; Sri Durgesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Sri S.K. Tripathi, learned counsel for the informant; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.124 of 2022, under Sections 147, 148, 307, 323, 452, 504 & 506 I.P.C., P.S. Talgram, District Kannauj, during pendency of the trial.

¶8

It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case; no specific role has been assigned to the applicant; medical report does not support the version of F.I.R.; the applicant has no criminal history. It has further been argued that co-accused Ram Prakash has been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.08.2022 passed in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No.30085 of 2022. Moreover, there is no prospect of trial of the present case being concluded in near future. The applicant is languishing in jail since 29.06.2022 and in case he is enlarged on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail and cooperate in trial.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶10

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and the mandate laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant, Jayveer @ Jaichandra, who is involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

¶12

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶13

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶14

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶16

Order Date :- 29.8.2022 Meenu

¶17

Digitally signed by MEENU SINGH Date: 2022.08.29 18:23:40 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jayveer @ Jaichandra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jayveer @ Jaichandra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muzammil Vs State of U.P.

Ashish Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Kaptan Vs State of U.P.

Vishal @ Vikash Vs State of U.P.

Mohd Sohrab Vs State of U.P.

Nazir Husain Vs State of U.P.