The High Court rejected the bail application as infructuous because the applicant had already been convicted in the Sessions Trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33261 of 2019
Applicant :- Rajaram Chaudhary Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ganesh Shanker Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mohd Shamim Khan
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Shri Sonu Nirmal, Advocate holding brief of Shri Ganesh Shanker Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Pankaj Kumar Tripathi, learned AGA for the State are present.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present bail application has become infructuous due to conviction of applicant in Sessions Trial.
Accordingly, the bail application is rejected as infructuous.
Order Date :- 17.5.2022 Bhanu
Digitally signed by BHANU PRATAP KUSHWAHA Date: 2022.05.18 17:41:29 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajaram Chaudhary
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
