Allowed

Ankur v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC6 Sept 2022BAIL/31149/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Ankur applied for bail in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He pleaded innocence and lack of gang involvement. The Court considered submissions and applied precedent to grant bail subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

The applicant be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount, subject to specified conditions.

Ankur Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 75

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31149 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Ankur Opposite Party : - State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

¶6

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant Ankur, with a prayer to release him in Case Crime No.214 of 2019, under section 2/3 of U.P.Gangsters and AntiSocial Activities (Prevention) Act 1986, Police Station Phase-II, District Gautam Budh Nagar, during pendency of the trial.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Single case is shown in the gang-chart. Applicant is on bail. Bail order is annexed with the bail application. He next contended that the applicant is neither involved in any antisocial activities nor a leader of any gang. The applicant is in jail since 01.03.2022. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail, if granted and co-operate in trial.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶9

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and the mandate laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018)3 SCC 22, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶10

Let the applicant, Ankur , who is involved in Case Crime No.214 of 2019, under section 2/3 of U.P.Gangsters and AntiSocial Activities (Prevention) Act 1986, Police Station Phase-II, District Gautam Budh Nagar, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

¶11

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the

¶12

investigation or trial.

¶13

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶14

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶16

Order Date :- 6.9.2022 SKD

¶17

Digitally signed by SURJIT KUMAR DEY Date: 2022.09.07 10:50:34 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ankur v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ankur v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Faizan Vs State of U.P.

Vineet Alias Vinay Vs State of U.P.

Yogesh Varma Vs State of U.P.

Guddu Vs State of U.P.

Anil Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Kapil Chauhan Vs State of U.P.