Allowed

Guddu v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC6 Sept 2022BAIL/23778/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed the bail application. The court considered the nature of the offence and an explanation of the applicant's criminal history. Bail was granted subject to a personal bond, two sureties, and specific conditions regarding witness tampering and cooperation in the trial.

What did the court decide?

Release of applicant on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties, subject to specific restrictive conditions.

Guddu Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 75

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23778 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Guddu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Atul Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 354 of 2022, registered under Sections 3/5/8 of U.P. Cow Slaughter (Prevention) Act, Police Station- Puranpur, District- Pilibhit during pendency of the trial.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Learned counsel for the applicant next submitted that applicant was not arrested on the spot. The applicant has been implicated in the present case only on the statement of police informer. Criminal history of the applicant has been explained in para 3 of the supplementary affidavit filed in support of the instant bail application. The applicant is languishing in jail since 11.05.2022. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and cooperate in trial.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶9

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and the mandate laid down by Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 , the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶10

Let the applicant, Guddu, who is involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

¶11

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the

¶12

investigation or trial.

¶13

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶14

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶16

Order Date :- 6.9.2022 Sachin/-

¶17

Digitally signed by SACHIN TIWARI Date: 2022.09.07 10:09:04 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Guddu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Guddu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Faizan Vs State of U.P.

Vineet Alias Vinay Vs State of U.P.

Yogesh Varma Vs State of U.P.

Ankur Vs State of U.P.

Anil Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Kapil Chauhan Vs State of U.P.