Muni Ram v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
In a bail application, the Court granted bail to the applicant who was arrested following the issuance of a non-bailable warrant for his absence from court proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two local heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.
What the court decided
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2983 of 2022
Applicant :- Muni Ram Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shahroze Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State respondent.
It is submitted that the applicant was granted bail in the present case by the court below on 17.08.2010 and since then he has been regularly appearing before the Court below. The applicant left the station and went to New Delhi for his livelihood, therefore, he could not attend the date fixed in the case and as such, non-bailable warrant was issued and the applicant was arrested on 29.11.2021 and since then he is in jail. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant shall appear on each and every date and shall not misuse the privilege of bail in future.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submission from the record.
Perused the material on record.
Having regard to the submissions made but without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Muni Ram
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Vivek Varma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/2983/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court