Allowed

Abid v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC29 Mar 2022BAIL/5136/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court considered a criminal bail application. The applicant, Abid, claimed false implication and lack of independent witnesses for an alleged recovery of buffalo. The Court observed that the opposing counsel could not satisfactorily dispute the submissions. The applicant was released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties.

What did the court decide?

The applicant Abid is released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of like amount.

Abid Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 74

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5136 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Abid Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ehtesham Afsar Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

It is submitted that the applicant was not named in the first information report and has been falsely implicated in the instant case. False recovery of buffalo has been shown from the applicant. There are no independent witnesses to the alleged recovery. It is contended that the co-accused Babu and Nijamuddin have been granted bail by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 2130 of 3.2.2022. The applicant claims parity. The criminal history of applicant has been explained in para 4 of the supplementary affidavit. The applicant is in jail since 2.12.2021. In case, the applicant is enlarged on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record.

¶8

Perused the first information report as well as the averments made in the bail application.

¶9

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, let the applicant Abid involved in case crime no.946 of 2021, under Sections 457, 380, 411 I.P.C., P.S. Izzat Nagar, District Bareilly be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned on the following conditions that:

¶10

the applicant shall not temper with the prosecution evidence.

¶11

the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witness;

¶12

the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court.

¶13

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.

¶14

Order Date :- 29.3.2022 S.S.

¶15

Digitally signed by SIDDHARTH SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.03.30 18:06:15 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Abid v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abid v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikas Vs State of U.P.

Virendra Singh Vs State of U.P.

Ajay Kumar Srivastava Vs State of U.P.

Sajir Vs State of U.P.

Lovely @ Aditya Vs State of U.P.

Mangal Singh Vs State of U.P.