Allowed

Manoj v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC7 Jul 2022BAIL/25487/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court allowed a bail application filed by an individual charged under Section 306 IPC. The court held that the applicant was entitled to bail and prescribed personal bond and two sureties along with standard bail conditions.

What did the court decide?

The applicant is released on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount with specific conditions to be adhered to.

Manoj Vs State of U.P. — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 70

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25487 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Manoj Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Saurabh Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.

¶5

By means of this bail application the applicant has prayed to be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No.235 of 2021 at Police Station Jalalabad District Shahjahanpur under Section 306 IPC. The applicant is in jail since 05.06.2021.

¶6

The bail application of the applicant was rejected by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Shahjahanpur on 10.09.2021.

¶7

Shri Saurabh Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. The FIR arises out of a petty neighbourhood dispute. The victim was a person of a sensitive nature who became depressed over a trivial issue in the neighbourhood. The applicant did not aid or abet the suicide. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant does not have any criminal history apart from this case.

¶8

Shri I.P. Srivastava, learned A.G.A for the State could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. Learned AGA does not dispute the fact

¶9

that the applicant does not have any criminal history apart from this case.

¶10

I see merit in the submissions of learned counsel for the applicant and accordingly hold that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶11

In the light of the preceding discussion and without making any observations on the merits of the case, the bail application is allowed.

¶12

Let the applicant-Manoj be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court below. The following conditions be imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶13

(i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶14

(ii) The applicant will not influence any witness.

¶15

(iii) The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶16

(iv) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶17

In case of breach of any of the above condition, the

¶18

prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.

¶19

Order Date :- 7.7.2022 Nadeem

¶20

Digitally signed by NADEEM AHMAD Date: 2022.07.12 10:33:11 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Manoj v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sandeep Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Praveen Vs State of U.P.

Kamil Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ashish Kumar Urf Lallu Vs State of U.P.and 3 Others

Mohit Vs State of U.P.

Monu Vs State of U.P. and Another