It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that in this case the applicant has been falsely implicated by the informant (brother of the deceased) after two days of the incident, in which the dead body of the deceased was found on railway track regarding which, information was given by the Railway Station Superintendent to the police. On the basis of which inquest was conducted and postmortem was got done. It is further submitted that in the postmortem report the crush injuries were found on the person of deceased and his deadbody was found in three parts, which clearly indicates that this was the case of railway accident. It is also submitted that at the time of inquest the informant and other relatives of the deceased were present but they did not disclose the name of this applicant for causing murder of the deceased but all of them expressed their opinion of the death of the deceased occurred as a result of railway accident. It is next submitted that on the basis of confessional statement of the applicant it has been disclosed that she committed murder of the deceased with the connivance of other accused persons, thereafter, they put the dead-body on the railway track to show the case as railway accident. During postmortem, cause of death was found as a result of antemortem injuries not postmortem injuries. In this way, the story as developed on the confessional statement of the applicant by the police becomes false. There is no evidence on record to show the complicity of this applicant and also no last seen witness was there to say that he had seen the applicant while committing murder of the deceased, thus, she is innocent. She in jail since 16.04.2021 having no criminal anticident, therefore, requested for bail. In case she is released on bail, she will not misuse the liberty of bail and will co-operate in trial.
