An application for bail was rejected. The court held that sections 147, 148, 149, 302 IPC and Section 7 CrPC were implicated. The applicant formed an unlawful assembly to cause the death of the deceased and was not entitled to bail at this stage.
The bail application was rejected; the applicant is not entitled to bail at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Reserved On:- 06.09.2022 Delivered On:- 17.09.2022
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23995 of 2022 Applicant :- Piyush Pal @ Ashutosh Pal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Atharva Dixit,Aushim Luthra,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Manoj Kumar,Vimlendu Tripathi Hon'ble Siddharth, J.
2
a contusion of 10 cm x 8 cm on the left side of head and multiple abrasion were found on his hand and legs. Only injury no. 1 and 2 are fatal for the deceased and implication of 7 named and 4 unnamed accused in this case is improbable.
3
deceased and gravity of offence the applicant is not found entitled to be enlarged on bail at this stage
Order Date :- 17.09.2022 Rohit
Digitally signed by ROHIT DAS Date: 2022.09.19 10:50:58 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail given the allegations of forming an unlawful assembly with a common object to commit murder.
Whether the non-assignment of a specific role to the applicant disentitles him from bail in a murder case under Section 149 IPC.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Piyush Pal @ Ashutosh Pal
Rohit Das
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
