Allowed

Vedprakash v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC11 Oct 2022BAIL/21229/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Sudhir Agrawal, J. treated the application for bail as fit case and granted bail to the applicant upon personal bond and two reliable sureties to secure his presence in court and prevent misuse of the liberty of bail.

What did the court decide?

Release of applicant on bail on personal bond and two sureties subject to conditions regarding court attendance and preventing abuse of bail.

Vedprakash Vs State of U.P. — Cheque Dishonour | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 70

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 21229 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Vedprakash Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Pandey,Mandeep Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record.

¶6

The present bail application has been filed by the applicant seeking bail in Case Crime No. 186 of 2017, under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477, 204 IPC, Police Station- Pahasu , District - Bulandshahr.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present crime. It is submitted that there is no evidence on record to indicate that the applicant has at any point of time practice deception for the purpose of cheating. It is submitted that as per FIR as well as statement recorded by the Investigating Officer no specific role has been assigned against the applicant. It is further stated that the applicant has no previous criminal history. It is also submitted that there is no apprehension that after being released on bail, he may flee from the course of law or may, otherwise, misuse the liberty of bail and the applicant is in jail since 22.3.2022 and the possibility of conclusion of trial in near future is very bleak.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has, however, opposed the prayer for grant of bail, but he has not disputed the above contention made by the learned counsel for the accused-applicant.

¶9

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, perusing the record and also considering the nature of allegations, arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail.

¶10

Let applicant namely Vedprakash be released on bail in the aforesaid Case Crime Number on his furnishing personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:-

¶11

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he

¶12

shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶13

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

(iii) In case, the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fail to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶16

Any violation of above conditions will be treated misuse of bail and learned Court below will be at liberty to pass appropriate order in the matter regarding cancellation of bail.

¶17

Order Date :- 11.10.2022 samz

¶18

(Piyush Agrawal, J.)

¶19

Digitally signed by SYED AKHTARMOHAMMAD MEQDAD Date: 2022.10.11 16:17:10 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vedprakash v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vedprakash v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamlesh Vs State of U.P.

Girish @ Golu Vs State of U.P.

Jitendra Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Ikrar Vs State of U.P.

Raju Vs State of U.P.

Gaurav @ Dainy Vs State of U.P.