Sahil v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Misc. Bail Application allowed. Court released applicant Sahil on personal bond and sureties, citing co-accused bail and lack of criminal antecedents without expressing opinion on merits of the case.
What did the court decide?
Release on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount.
What the court decided
Court No. - 76
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 17606 of 2022
Applicant :- Sahil Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sikandar Raza Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
It is submitted that in this case applicant has been falsely implicated by the police for causing injuries to the deceased who later on succumbed to injuries. Further submitted that occurrence took place on 12.11.2015 in the night at about 9:00 P.M. and F.I.R. was lodged against unknown persons. During investigation on 15.01.2016 this applicant was arrested in a police encounter and false recovery of country-made pistol was shown from his possession, thereafter, on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, police roped him in the present case. There is no evidence on record to show the complicity of this applicant for causing injuries to the deceased. Further submitted that co-accused Sabir @ Akram has already been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 17.12.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.41366 of 2021. The case of this applicant stands on similar footing to that of aforesaid co-accused. There is no criminal antecedent against the applicant and he is in jail since 16.01.2016, therefore, requested for bail. In case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will co-operate in trial.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant satisfies the requirements for bail in a case involving §§ 395, 396, 412 IPC.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sahil
Coram
Subhash Chandra Sharma
Ashok Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/17606/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court