Allowed

Umesh @ Pappu Saroj v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC31 Aug 2022BAIL/9627/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble High Court allowed the bail application of Umesh @ Pappu Saroj, who was accused in a crime under Sections 302, 307 and 120-B/34 IPC. The court found the applicant had made out a case for bail and released him on personal and surety bonds.

What did the court decide?

Appeal allowed. Applicant released on bail on furnishing personal bond and two sureties subject to standard bail conditions.

Umesh @ Pappu Saroj Vs State of U.P. — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 76

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9627 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Umesh @ Pappu Saroj Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Raghvendra Prakash,Pramod Kumar Sahani

¶4

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

¶7

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Applicant was not named in the F.I.R. During investigation, the name of this applicant was brought into light on the basis of statement made by informant and injured Vinod after two days of the alleged incident in which injured Vinod has assigned the role of catching hold to this applicant. Specific role of stabbing with knife has been assigned to co-accused Nikhil. Further submitted that at the time of inquest real brother, Raja Ram of this applicant was present and also participated in the proceeding but no any such statement was made against this applicant. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of applicant. There is no criminal history against the applicant. He is languishing in jail since 28.10.2021 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.

¶8

Learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.

¶9

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶10

Let the applicant Umesh @ Pappu Saroj involved in Case Crime No. 225 of 2021, under Sections 302, 307, 120-B/34 I.P.C., P.S. Gambhirpur, District Azamgarh be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions.

¶11

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the

¶12

trial.

¶13

The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶14

The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶15

The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected of the commission of which he is suspected.

¶16

The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶17

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.

¶18

Order Date :- 31.8.2022 A. Singh

¶19

Digitally signed by ANURAG SINGH Date: 2022.09.02 16:06:52 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Umesh @ Pappu Saroj v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Umesh @ Pappu Saroj v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naresh Vs State of U.P.

Vipin and Another Vs State of U.P and 3 Others

Smt Krishna Devi Vs State of U.P.

Rahul Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Fazil Vs State of U.P.

Sukhraj Singh Alias Sukkha Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others