Criminal Misc. Bail Application by Nitin Chauhan was adjudicated. Counsel for the informant argued the applicant was a repeat offender with fraudulent transactions. The Hon'ble Court held no case for bail was made out and dismissed the application.
Bail application dismissed as no case for bail was made out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 68
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1593 of 2022
Applicant :- Nitin Chauhan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Dubey,Krishna Kant Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sanjeev Kumar Asthana,Vinay Kumar Singh Chandel
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Shri Sanjeev Kumar Asthana, learned counsel for the informant and Shri Nafees Ahmad, learned AGa submit that the applicant had repeatedly made fraudulent transactions in respect of the informant's property. The applicant is a repeat offender. The bail of the coaccused has also been rejected.
At this stage no case for bail is made out.
The bail application is dismissed.
Order Date :- 27.4.2022 Dhananjai
Digitally signed by DHANANJAI Date: 2022.04.28 15:08:24 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail can be granted to a repeatoffender involved in fraudulent transactions.
Whether a prima facie case for bail is made out in the present bail application
Nitin Chauhan
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
