Allowed

Virendra Kumar Gond v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC26 Apr 2022BAIL/5079/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants bail to an applicant falsely implicated in a cheating and forgery case pending trial. The court allowed the bail application without making observations on the merits, subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

The applicant is released on bail on personal bond and two sureties subject to conditions against tampering with evidence and influencing witnesses.

Virendra Kumar Gond Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 68

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5079 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Virendra Kumar Gond Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.

¶5

By means of this bail application the applicant has prayed to be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No.6863 of 2009 at Police Station-Kotwali, District-Maharajganj under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC. The applicant is in jail since 14.12.2021.

¶6

The bail application of the applicant was rejected by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.1, Maharajganj on 05.01.2022.

¶7

Shri Ajay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. The applicant was appointed as Shiksha Mitra. He had submitted original documents in support of his candidature and he was fully eligible for appointment. The applicant did not forge any documents. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant does not have any criminal history apart from the instant case.

¶8

Shri Paritosh Kumar Malviya, learned A.G.A.

¶9

could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. He, however, does not dispute the fact that the applicant does not have any criminal history apart from this case.

¶10

I see merit in the submissions of the learned counsel for the applicant and hold that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶11

In the light of the preceding discussion and without making any observations on the merits of the case, the bail application is allowed.

¶12

Let the applicant-Virendra Kumar Gaur be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions.

¶13

(i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶14

(ii) The applicant will not influence any witness. (iii) The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶15

(iv) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court to any police officer or tamper with the

¶16

evidence.

¶17

In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court. Order Date :- 26.4.2022 Ashish Tripathi

¶18

Digitally signed by ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI Date: 2022.04.28 11:58:12 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Virendra Kumar Gond v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Virendra Kumar Gond v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rai Anoop Prasad Vs State of U.P.

Nazir Hussain Vs State of U.P.

Videshi Ram Vs State of U.P.

Prathvipal Vs State of U.P.

Anil Maurya Vs State of U.P.

Brajendra @ Balla Vs State of U.P.