Vinod v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13660 of 2022
Applicant :- Vinod Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Goyal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ravi Prakash Srivastava
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Sri Shubham Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ashish Goyal, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ravi Prakash Srivastava, learned counsel for the first informant and the learned A.G.A. are present.
Learned counsel for the applicant has drawn the attention of the Court submitting that as the orders of conviction and sentence pertaining to the present applicant has been passed by the trial court on 06.05.2022 and 07.05.2022, the present bail application has been become infructuous and may be dismissed as such.
In view of the above, the present application is dismissed as being infructuous.
Order Date :- 23.5.2022 aks
Digitally signed by ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.05.25 16:45:02 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vinod
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court