Disposed

Rishipal and Another v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC15 Nov 2022ABAIL/9962/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 9962 of 2022, the Single Judge Court disposed of the application upon counsel's prayer. While there was no formal withdrawal, the court directed applicants to surrender within four weeks and filed a regular bail application decided per Satender Kumar Antil guidelines with no coercive action for that period.

What did the court decide?

Applicants directed to surrender before the concerned court below within four weeks; no coercive action to be taken against them for the period or till surrender.

Rishipal and Another Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 78

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9962 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Rishipal And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pawan Singh Pundir Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for applicants as well as Sri Vibhav Anand Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶6

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No. 350 of 2021, under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B and 506 I.P.C., P.S. Sadar Bazar, district Saharanpur.

¶7

After arguing for some time, applicants' counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicants.

¶9

In view of the above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that the applicants shall surrender before the concerned court below within four weeks from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid by Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).

¶10

For the period of four weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants- Rishipal and Abhishek Verma in the above case.

¶11

With the above observations and directions, this application is disposed of.

¶12

Order Date :- 15.11.2022 Shalini

¶13

Digitally signed by SHALINI JAISWAL Date: 2022.11.16 12:42:48 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rishipal and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rishipal and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kapil @ Anmol Gulati Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ajeet Singh and Another Vs State of U.P.

Satyawant Govind Rao Vs State of U.P.and Another

Arjun Vs State of U.P. and Another

Om Prakash Vs State of U.P. and Another

Anil Yadav Vs State of U.P.