The single judge in Allahabad High Court regarded the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn and dismissed it without addressing the underlying substantive issues. No legal proposition was discussed.
Anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9778 of 2022
Applicant :- Arjun Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Binod Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Sri Binod Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present anticipatory bail application may be dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the statement so made, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
The certified copy of the orders and other relevant documents shall be returned to the counsel for the applicant as per the Rules of the High Court after obtaining photostat copies, which shall be kept on record.
Order Date :- 15.11.2022 Ravi Kant
Digitally signed by RAVI KANT Date: 2022.11.15 17:31:06 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Arjun
Krishan Pahal
Ravi Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
