Vipin Sharma v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application rejected by the High Court for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear.
What the court decided
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8451 of 2022
Applicant :- Vipin Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilesh Chandra Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Pushpendra Singh
Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
This is anticipatory bail application.
List revised. Case called out twice. None appears on behalf of the applicant nor any adjournment slip has been sent.
Learned A.G.A. is present for the State.
In view of the above, this anticipatory bail application is rejected for want of prosecution.
Office is directed to communicate this order to the court concerned forthwith to proceed further in the matter.
Order Date :- 25.11.2022 Virendra
Digitally signed by VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA Date: 2022.11.25 14:26:19 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vipin Sharma
Coram
Suresh Kumar Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/8451/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court