Dismissed

Mamta Shukla v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC27 Sept 2022ABAIL/821/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under S. 438 Cr.P.C. Counsel requested withdrawal of the application with liberty to file for regular bail. The court allowed withdrawal, directed surrender within six weeks, and stipulated that no coercive action be taken for four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as withdrawn; applicant directed to surrender within six weeks; no coercive action for four weeks.

Mamta Shukla Vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 78

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 821 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Mamta Shukla Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Madhusudan Dikshit Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Kirtikar Pande

¶4

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Madhusudan Dikshit, learned counsel for applicant, Sri Kirtikar Pande, learned counsel for the first informant and Sri P.K. Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for State .

¶6

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No. 307 of 2018, Charge sheet No. A-30 of 2019 dated 28.1.2019, Criminal Case No. 210 of 2019, under sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali, district Ballia.

¶7

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.

¶9

In view of the above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within six weeks from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid by Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶10

For the period of four weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant- Mamta Shukla in the above case.

¶11

With the above observations and directions, this application is disposed of.

¶12

Order Date :- 27.9.2022 Shalini

¶13

Digitally signed by SHALINI JAISWAL Date: 2022.09.28 10:47:45 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mamta Shukla v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mamta Shukla v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonu(Minor) Vs State of U.P.

Abdul Rahman Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Smt. Pyari Devi and 7 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Pankaj Rajpoot Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Sandeep Vs State of U.P and 2 Others

Anwar Vs State of U.P.